[ he's had enough people ignore the moral dilemma and insist they'd brute force their way through the problems (which, although not unrelatable to him, does make the thought experiment less fun!) that those have become a stale, boring shield of an answer. everyone likes to fantasize that they're capable of saving everyone else, don't they? ]
I see it makes the most sense numerically after all the greatest good for the greatest number.
in the most cruel, cold logic of it, that's the optimal solution
of course i'd prefer another way. of course i'd look for another way. but the scenario laid out as you've laid it out, that's the answer. one life for the many.
if I wouldn't do it when the cure's a stranger, why would I do it when it's someone I know? maybe if it was my worst enemy there'd be something to think about.
no subject
I see
it makes the most sense numerically after all
the greatest good for the greatest number.
no subject
of course i'd prefer another way. of course i'd look for another way. but the scenario laid out as you've laid it out, that's the answer. one life for the many.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
sounds like you make up for each other's shortcomings.
but to be fair, I also said you couldn't obtain their agreement, so I guess your person never has to know.
no subject
[ not that he couldn't. he's done it before. ]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
though he might not if i begged him not to
no subject
no subject
no subject
it's not like there's a right or wrong answer.
[ there's just what he thinks about them! ]
no subject
what about you? how would you deal with this situation? kill the child?
no subject
I wouldn't do anything
no subject
no subject
it's got nothing to do with me
no subject
no subject
maybe if it was my worst enemy there'd be something to think about.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)